↓ Skip to main content

Estimating the benefits from collaboration: The case of SEMATECH

Overview of attention for article published in Review of Industrial Organization, October 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Estimating the benefits from collaboration: The case of SEMATECH
Published in
Review of Industrial Organization, October 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf00214832
Authors

Albert N. Link, David J. Teece, William F. Finan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Denmark 1 3%
Switzerland 1 3%
Unknown 29 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 34%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Professor 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 14 44%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 13%
Social Sciences 4 13%
Engineering 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2003.
All research outputs
#7,495,032
of 22,912,409 outputs
Outputs from Review of Industrial Organization
#124
of 310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,569
of 28,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Industrial Organization
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,912,409 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them