↓ Skip to main content

Microtus species as new herbivorous laboratory animals: Reproduction; Bacterial flora and fermentation in the digestive tracts; And nutritional physiology

Overview of attention for article published in Veterinary Research Communications, December 1984
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Microtus species as new herbivorous laboratory animals: Reproduction; Bacterial flora and fermentation in the digestive tracts; And nutritional physiology
Published in
Veterinary Research Communications, December 1984
DOI 10.1007/bf02214700
Pubmed ID
Authors

H. Kudo, Y. Oki

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Other 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 4 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Neuroscience 2 9%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 4 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1995.
All research outputs
#7,495,032
of 22,912,409 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Research Communications
#83
of 477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,302
of 38,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Research Communications
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,912,409 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 477 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them