↓ Skip to main content

Food partitioning among Malagasy primates

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, April 1988
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
242 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
Food partitioning among Malagasy primates
Published in
Oecologia, April 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf00376949
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jörg U. Ganzhorn

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
Brazil 5 4%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 124 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 21%
Student > Master 26 19%
Researcher 25 19%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 17 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 50%
Environmental Science 25 19%
Engineering 3 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 22 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2003.
All research outputs
#7,495,032
of 22,912,409 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,680
of 4,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,711
of 13,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,912,409 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them