| Title |
Analyzing Geographic Patterns of Disease Incidence: Rates of Late-Stage Colorectal Cancer in Iowa
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Systems, June 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1023/b:joms.0000032841.39701.36 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gerard Rushton, Ika Peleg, Aniruddha Banerjee, Geoffrey Smith, Michele West |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 7% |
| Israel | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 41 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 38% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 18% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 18% |
| Unknown | 10 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2010.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Systems
#320
of 1,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,859
of 62,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Systems
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,272 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them