↓ Skip to main content

Feeding ecology of western lowland gorillas in the Nouabalé-Ndoki National Park, Congo

Overview of attention for article published in Primates, April 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
162 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Feeding ecology of western lowland gorillas in the Nouabalé-Ndoki National Park, Congo
Published in
Primates, April 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf02381342
Authors

Tomoaki Nishihara

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 76 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 20%
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 44%
Environmental Science 17 21%
Psychology 6 7%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 12 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2003.
All research outputs
#7,495,032
of 22,912,409 outputs
Outputs from Primates
#471
of 1,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,563
of 25,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primates
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,912,409 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,015 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 25,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.