↓ Skip to main content

Further evidence of insect consumption in the bearded saki monkey,Chiropotes satanas chiropotes

Overview of attention for article published in Primates, October 1983
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Further evidence of insect consumption in the bearded saki monkey,Chiropotes satanas chiropotes
Published in
Primates, October 1983
DOI 10.1007/bf02381693
Authors

Russell A. Mittermeier, William R. Konstant, Howard Ginsberg, Marc G. M. van Roosmalen, Espedito Cordeiro da Silva

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 25%
Researcher 4 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 25%
Librarian 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 63%
Environmental Science 2 13%
Psychology 2 13%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2003.
All research outputs
#7,495,032
of 22,912,409 outputs
Outputs from Primates
#471
of 1,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,178
of 8,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primates
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,912,409 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,015 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.