↓ Skip to main content

Habitat Use and Ranging of Wild Bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Wamba

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Primatology, December 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
Title
Habitat Use and Ranging of Wild Bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Wamba
Published in
International Journal of Primatology, December 1998
DOI 10.1023/a:1020378320913
Authors

Chie Hashimoto, Yasuko Tashiro, Daiji Kimura, Tomoo Enomoto, Ellen J. Ingmanson, Gen'ichi Idani, Takeshi Furuichi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 7 5%
United Kingdom 2 1%
India 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 138 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 44 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 17%
Student > Master 20 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 14 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 83 56%
Environmental Science 17 11%
Psychology 9 6%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 3%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 19 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2003.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Primatology
#592
of 1,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,474
of 109,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Primatology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.