↓ Skip to main content

A formal method for subjective design evaluation with multiple attributes

Overview of attention for article published in Research in Engineering Design, June 1991
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 105)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
200 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
A formal method for subjective design evaluation with multiple attributes
Published in
Research in Engineering Design, June 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf01581343
Authors

Deborah L. Thurston

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 7%
Chile 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 92 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 37%
Student > Master 15 15%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 15 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 51 50%
Computer Science 12 12%
Design 9 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 <1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 21 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1998.
All research outputs
#7,495,032
of 22,912,409 outputs
Outputs from Research in Engineering Design
#15
of 105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,001
of 17,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research in Engineering Design
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,912,409 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 105 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them