↓ Skip to main content

Electricity generation from rice bran in microbial fuel cells

Overview of attention for article published in Bioresources and Bioprocessing, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Electricity generation from rice bran in microbial fuel cells
Published in
Bioresources and Bioprocessing, November 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40643-016-0129-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shu Takahashi, Morio Miyahara, Atsushi Kouzuma, Kazuya Watanabe

Abstract

Rice bran is a by-product of the rice milling process and mostly discarded in Japan. Although many studies have shown that microbial fuel cells (MFCs) are able to generate electricity from organic wastes, limited studies have examined MFCs for generating electricity from rice bran. Laboratory-scale single-chamber MFCs were inoculated with paddy field soil and supplied with rice bran for examining electricity generation. Power outputs and microbiome compositions were compared between MFCs containing pure water as the liquid phase (MFC-W) and those containing mineral solution (MFC-M). Polarization analyses showed that both MFCs successfully generated electricity with the maximum power densities of 360 and 520 mW m(-2) (based on the projected area of anode) for MFC-W and MFC-M, respectively. Amplicon-sequencing analyses revealed that Trichococcus and Geobacter specifically occurred in anode biofilms in MFC-W and MFC-M, respectively. The results suggest that rice bran is a feasible fuel by itself for generating electricity in MFCs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 12 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 18%
Engineering 6 14%
Environmental Science 4 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 18 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2016.
All research outputs
#18,909,315
of 24,093,053 outputs
Outputs from Bioresources and Bioprocessing
#81
of 137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#294,629
of 422,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioresources and Bioprocessing
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,093,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 137 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.