| Title |
Fully coupled climate/dynamical vegetation model simulations over Northern Africa during the mid-Holocene
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climate Dynamics, August 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s003820000065 |
| Authors |
R. Doherty, J. Kutzbach, J. Foley, D. Pollard |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Czechia | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 27% |
| Researcher | 13 | 22% |
| Professor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 6 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 32 | 54% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2003.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#2,220
of 5,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,801
of 38,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,369 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.