↓ Skip to main content

Long-term effectiveness of steroid injections and splinting in mild and moderate carpal tunnel syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Neurological Sciences, June 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Long-term effectiveness of steroid injections and splinting in mild and moderate carpal tunnel syndrome
Published in
Neurological Sciences, June 2004
DOI 10.1007/s10072-004-0229-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Sevim, O. Dogu, H. Çamdeviren, H. Kaleagasi, M. Aral, E. Arslan, A. Milcan

Abstract

To evaluate the long-term efficacy of non-surgical treatment methods for mild and moderate carpal tunnel syndrome, 120 patients with clinical symptoms and electrophysiologic evidence were included in a prospective, randomized and blinded trial: 60 patients were instructed to wear splints every night, 30 received injections of betamethasone 4 cm proximal to the carpal tunnel, and 30 received injections distal to the carpal tunnel. After approximately 1 year (mean, 11 months; range, 9-14), 108 patients were available for final evaluation. We assessed clinical symptom severity and performed detailed electrophysiologic examinations before and after treatment. Splinting provided symptomatic relief and improved sensory and motor nerve conduction velocities at the long-term follow-up when the splints were worn almost every night. Proximal and distal injections of steroids were ineffective on the basis of both clinical symptoms and electrophysiologic findings.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 72 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Researcher 6 8%
Professor 5 7%
Other 20 27%
Unknown 18 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Unspecified 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 21 28%