↓ Skip to main content

Rheumatic fever in a high incidence population: the importance of monoarthritis and low grade fever

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Disease in Childhood, September 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rheumatic fever in a high incidence population: the importance of monoarthritis and low grade fever
Published in
Archives of Disease in Childhood, September 2001
DOI 10.1136/adc.85.3.223
Pubmed ID
Authors

J R Carapetis, B J Currie

Abstract

To describe the clinical features of rheumatic fever and to assess the Jones criteria in a population and setting similar to that in many developing countries.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 68 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 12 17%
Student > Master 10 14%
Other 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Researcher 5 7%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 15 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 16 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2012.
All research outputs
#6,754,036
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Disease in Childhood
#2,878
of 7,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,359
of 40,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Disease in Childhood
#15
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,812 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.