↓ Skip to main content

Delineating a Recharge Area for a Spring Using Numerical Modeling, Monte Carlo Techniques, and Geochemical Investigation

Overview of attention for article published in Ground Water, December 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Delineating a Recharge Area for a Spring Using Numerical Modeling, Monte Carlo Techniques, and Geochemical Investigation
Published in
Ground Water, December 2005
DOI 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2001.tb02360.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Randall J. Hunt, Jeffery J. Steuer, M. Teresa C. Mansor, Thomas D. Bullen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 27%
Researcher 5 23%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Professor 2 9%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 36%
Environmental Science 6 27%
Engineering 4 18%
Chemistry 1 5%
Unknown 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2004.
All research outputs
#8,302,038
of 24,838,271 outputs
Outputs from Ground Water
#248
of 890 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,001
of 164,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ground Water
#13
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,838,271 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 890 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.