↓ Skip to main content

Menstrual and reproductive factors in relation to mammographic density: the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN)

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, December 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Menstrual and reproductive factors in relation to mammographic density: the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN)
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, December 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10549-007-9840-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lesley M. Butler, Ellen B. Gold, Gail A. Greendale, Carolyn J. Crandall, Francesmary Modugno, Nina Oestreicher, Charles P. Quesenberry, Laurel A. Habel

Abstract

Menstrual and reproductive factors may increase breast cancer risk through a pathway that includes increased mammographic density. We assessed whether known or suspected menstrual and reproductive breast cancer risk factors were cross-sectionally associated with mammographic density, by measuring area of radiographic density and total breast area on mammograms from 801 participants in the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN), a multi-ethnic cohort of pre- and early perimenopausal women. From multivariable linear regression, the following menstrual or reproductive factors were independently associated with percent mammographic density (area of dense breast/breast area): older age at menarche (beta=10.3, P<0.01, for >13 vs. <12 years), premenstrual cravings and bloating (beta=-3.36, P=0.02), younger age at first full-term birth (beta=-8.12, P<0.01 for <or=23 years versus no births), greater number of births (beta=-6.80, P<0.01 for >or=3 births versus no births), and premenopausal status (beta=3.78, P<0.01 versus early perimenopausal). Only number of births remained associated with percent density after adjustment for age, race/ethnicity, study site, body mass index (BMI), and smoking. In addition, stratified analyses revealed that the association with number of births was confined to women within the lowest BMI tertile (beta=-12.2, P<0.01 for >or=3 births versus no births). Our data support a mechanism for parity and breast cancer that involves mammographic density among pre- and early perimenopausal women that may be modified by body size.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 14 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Sports and Recreations 4 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 15 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2010.
All research outputs
#7,495,032
of 22,912,409 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#1,659
of 4,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,436
of 156,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#11
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,912,409 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.