You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Critical Issues in Translational and Clinical Research for the Study of New Technologies to Enhance Bone Repair
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume, February 2008
|
| DOI | 10.2106/jbjs.g.01090 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jörg Goldhahn, Bruce Mitlak, Per Aspenberg, John A Kanis, René Rizzoli, Jean-Yves Reginster |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ukraine | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 19% |
| Researcher | 6 | 16% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 5 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 51% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2010.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume
#2,575
of 5,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,813
of 172,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume
#17
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,943 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.