↓ Skip to main content

Experiencing ownership over a dark-skinned body reduces implicit racial bias

Overview of attention for article published in Cognition, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
twitter
32 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
174 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
315 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Experiencing ownership over a dark-skinned body reduces implicit racial bias
Published in
Cognition, May 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.04.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lara Maister, Natalie Sebanz, Günther Knoblich, Manos Tsakiris

Abstract

Previous studies have investigated how existing social attitudes towards other races affect the way we 'share' their bodily experiences, for example in empathy for pain, and sensorimotor mapping. Here, we ask whether it is possible to alter implicit racial attitudes by experimentally increasing self-other bodily overlap. Employing a bodily illusion known as the 'Rubber Hand Illusion', we delivered multisensory stimulation to light-skinned Caucasian participants to induce the feeling that a dark-skinned hand belonged to them. We then measured whether this could change their implicit racial biases against people with dark skin. Across two experiments, the more intense the participants' illusion of ownership over the dark-skinned rubber hand, the more positive their implicit racial attitudes became. Importantly, it was not the pattern of multisensory stimulation per se, but rather, it was the change in the subjective experience of body ownership that altered implicit attitudes. These findings suggest that inducing an overlap between the bodies of self and other through illusory ownership is an effective way to change and reduce negative implicit attitudes towards outgroups.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 315 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 304 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 20%
Researcher 49 16%
Student > Bachelor 39 12%
Student > Master 36 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 9%
Other 52 17%
Unknown 48 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 144 46%
Computer Science 25 8%
Social Sciences 20 6%
Neuroscience 19 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Other 34 11%
Unknown 63 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 186. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2020.
All research outputs
#218,818
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from Cognition
#52
of 3,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,411
of 205,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognition
#1
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.