| Title |
New Zealand's ITQ system: have the first eight years been a success or a failure?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, March 1996
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00058519 |
| Authors |
John H. Annala |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Iceland | 1 | 1% |
| Namibia | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 84 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 12 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 21 | 23% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 10 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1999.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#353
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,566
of 27,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 27,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.