| Title |
A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: Viewing streams in a watershed context
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Management, March 1986
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01867358 |
| Authors |
Christopher A. Frissell, William J. Liss, Charles E. Warren, Michael D. Hurley |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 32 | 3% |
| Brazil | 16 | 1% |
| Canada | 6 | <1% |
| Austria | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1178 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 265 | 21% |
| Researcher | 236 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 234 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 83 | 7% |
| Other | 64 | 5% |
| Other | 201 | 16% |
| Unknown | 176 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 447 | 36% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 411 | 33% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 90 | 7% |
| Engineering | 46 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | <1% |
| Other | 36 | 3% |
| Unknown | 223 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,379,821
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#147
of 1,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#282
of 10,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,984 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them