You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Eruptive history of Mount Mazama and Crater Lake Caldera, Cascade Range, U.S.A.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Volcanology & Geothermal Research, October 1983
|
| DOI | 10.1016/0377-0273(83)90004-5 |
| Authors |
Charles R. Bacon |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 89 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 26% |
| Researcher | 21 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 13 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 55 | 57% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 23 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2023.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Volcanology & Geothermal Research
#440
of 2,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#954
of 8,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Volcanology & Geothermal Research
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,021 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.