↓ Skip to main content

Natural helping functions of lay health advisors in breast cancer education

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, January 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Natural helping functions of lay health advisors in breast cancer education
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, January 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf00694741
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eugenia Eng, Jacqueline Smith

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Unknown 39 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 22%
Researcher 8 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 15%
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 12%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 29%
Social Sciences 9 22%
Psychology 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 9 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2000.
All research outputs
#7,495,032
of 22,912,409 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#1,659
of 4,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,189
of 76,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#8
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,912,409 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.