↓ Skip to main content

Shock melting and vaporization of lunar rocks and minerals

Overview of attention for article published in Earth, Moon, and Planets, April 1972
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
180 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Shock melting and vaporization of lunar rocks and minerals
Published in
Earth, Moon, and Planets, April 1972
DOI 10.1007/bf00562927
Authors

Thomas J. Ahrens, John D. O'Keefe

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Unknown 80 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 23%
Student > Master 15 18%
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Professor 6 7%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 46 55%
Physics and Astronomy 11 13%
Engineering 3 4%
Chemistry 2 2%
Materials Science 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 14 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1991.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Moon, and Planets
#82
of 324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#778
of 3,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Moon, and Planets
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 3,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.