↓ Skip to main content

Screening for fra(X)(q) in a population of mentally retarded males

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, April 1983
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Screening for fra(X)(q) in a population of mentally retarded males
Published in
Human Genetics, April 1983
DOI 10.1007/bf00291535
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ursula Froster-Iskenius, Gabriele Felsch, C. Schirren, E. Schwinger

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Psychology 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1991.
All research outputs
#7,495,032
of 22,912,409 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#938
of 2,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,154
of 8,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,912,409 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.