↓ Skip to main content

Physical exercise and quality of life following cancer diagnosis: A literature review

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Behavioral Medicine, June 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
311 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Physical exercise and quality of life following cancer diagnosis: A literature review
Published in
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, June 1999
DOI 10.1007/bf02908298
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kerry S. Courneya, Christine M. Friedenreich

Abstract

With almost 8 million Americans alive today who have been through the cancer experience, it is important to develop interventions to maintain quality of life (QOL) following cancer diagnosis. Physical exercise is an intervention that may address the broad range of QOL issues following cancer diagnosis including physical, functional, psychological, emotional, and social well-being. The purpose of the present article was to provide a comprehensive and critical review of the topic and to offer suggestions for future research. The review located 24 empirical studies published between 1980 and 1997. Eighteen of the studies were interventions (i.e. quasi-experimental or experimental) but most of these were preliminary efficacy studies that suffered from the common limitations of such designs. Overall, however, the studies have consistently demonstrated that physical exercise has a positive effect on QOL following cancer diagnosis, including physical and functional well-being (e.g. functional capacity, muscular strength, body composition, nausea, fatigue) and psychological and emotional well-being (e.g. personality functioning, mood states, self-esteem, and QOL). Besides overcoming the limitations of past research, recommendations for future research included: (a) extending the research beyond breast and early-stage cancers; (b) comparing and integrating physical exercise with other QOL interventions; (c) examining resistance exercises, the timing of the intervention, and contextual factors; (d) expanding the breadth of the QOL indicators examined; and (e) investigating the rates and determinants of recruitment and adherence to an exercise program following cancer diagnosis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 218 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 22%
Student > Bachelor 30 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 13%
Researcher 19 8%
Student > Postgraduate 14 6%
Other 42 19%
Unknown 43 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 25%
Psychology 39 17%
Sports and Recreations 33 15%
Social Sciences 12 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 5%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 49 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2018.
All research outputs
#1,486,754
of 23,613,071 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#181
of 1,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#750
of 35,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,613,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them