Title |
Research and Development Costs for New Drugs by Therapeutic Category
|
---|---|
Published in |
PharmacoEconomics, November 2012
|
DOI | 10.2165/00019053-199507020-00007 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joseph A. DiMasi, Ronald W. Hansen, Henry C. Grabowski, Louis Lasagna |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 47 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 18% |
Student > Master | 7 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 18% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 12% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 10% |
Chemistry | 5 | 10% |
Other | 11 | 22% |
Unknown | 6 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2018.
All research outputs
#3,121,464
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from PharmacoEconomics
#294
of 1,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,837
of 192,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PharmacoEconomics
#33
of 383 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 383 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.