↓ Skip to main content

“Moving to the beat” improves timing perception

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
Title
“Moving to the beat” improves timing perception
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, May 2013
DOI 10.3758/s13423-013-0439-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona Manning, Michael Schutz

Abstract

Here, we demonstrate that "moving to the beat" can improve the perception of timing, providing an intriguing explanation as to why we often move when listening to music. In the first experiment, participants heard a series of isochronous beats and identified whether the timing of a final tone after a short silence was consistent with the timing of the preceding sequence. On half of the trials, participants tapped along with the beat, and on half of the trials, they listened without moving. When the final tone occurred later than expected, performance in the movement condition was significantly better than performance in the no-movement condition. Two additional experiments illustrate that this improved performance is due to improved timekeeping, rather than to a shift in strategy. This work contributes to a growing literature on sensorimotor integration by demonstrating body movement's objective improvement in timekeeping, complementing previous explorations involving subjective tasks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
Canada 2 1%
Norway 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 161 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 22%
Student > Master 26 15%
Researcher 22 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 30 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 69 41%
Neuroscience 29 17%
Arts and Humanities 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Linguistics 4 2%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 39 23%