↓ Skip to main content

Rhythm synchronization performance and auditory working memory in early- and late-trained musicians

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
Title
Rhythm synchronization performance and auditory working memory in early- and late-trained musicians
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, May 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00221-010-2299-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer A. Bailey, Virginia B. Penhune

Abstract

Behavioural and neuroimaging studies provide evidence for a possible "sensitive" period in childhood development during which musical training results in long-lasting changes in brain structure and auditory and motor performance. Previous work from our laboratory has shown that adult musicians who begin training before the age of 7 (early-trained; ET) perform better on a visuomotor task than those who begin after the age of 7 (late-trained; LT), even when matched on total years of musical training and experience. Two questions were raised regarding the findings from this experiment. First, would this group performance difference be observed using a more familiar, musically relevant task such as auditory rhythms? Second, would cognitive abilities mediate this difference in task performance? To address these questions, ET and LT musicians, matched on years of musical training, hours of current practice and experience, were tested on an auditory rhythm synchronization task. The task consisted of six woodblock rhythms of varying levels of metrical complexity. In addition, participants were tested on cognitive subtests measuring vocabulary, working memory and pattern recognition. The two groups of musicians differed in their performance of the rhythm task, such that the ET musicians were better at reproducing the temporal structure of the rhythms. There were no group differences on the cognitive measures. Interestingly, across both groups, individual task performance correlated with auditory working memory abilities and years of formal training. These results support the idea of a sensitive period during the early years of childhood for developing sensorimotor synchronization abilities via musical training.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 220 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 21%
Student > Master 39 17%
Researcher 29 13%
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 8%
Other 39 17%
Unknown 30 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 83 37%
Neuroscience 35 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 5%
Arts and Humanities 11 5%
Other 36 16%
Unknown 38 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2013.
All research outputs
#14,643,434
of 25,182,110 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#1,617
of 3,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,919
of 102,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#21
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,182,110 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.