↓ Skip to main content

Downstream effects of dams on channel geometry and bottomland vegetation: Regional patterns in the great plains

Overview of attention for article published in Wetlands, December 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
212 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Downstream effects of dams on channel geometry and bottomland vegetation: Regional patterns in the great plains
Published in
Wetlands, December 1998
DOI 10.1007/bf03161677
Authors

Friedman, W. R. Osterkamp, Michael L. Scott, Gregor T. Auble

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 125 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 18%
Researcher 22 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 26 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 32 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 24 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 16%
Engineering 10 8%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 33 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2004.
All research outputs
#7,495,032
of 22,912,409 outputs
Outputs from Wetlands
#226
of 1,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,833
of 99,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wetlands
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,912,409 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,247 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them