| Title |
Flexible habitat selection and interactive habitat segregation in the marine congeners Idotea baltica and Idotea emarginata (Crustacea, Isopoda)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Marine Biology, July 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00227-006-0421-2 |
| Authors |
H.-D. Franke, L. Gutow, M. Janke |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 39 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 60% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 19% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 4 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2007.
All research outputs
#15,271,909
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#2,712
of 3,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,706
of 65,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#16
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.