↓ Skip to main content

Intercomparison, interpretation, and assessment of spring phenology in North America estimated from remote sensing for 1982–2006

Overview of attention for article published in Global Change Biology, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
852 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
731 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intercomparison, interpretation, and assessment of spring phenology in North America estimated from remote sensing for 1982–2006
Published in
Global Change Biology, September 2009
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01910.x
Authors

MICHAEL A. WHITE, KIRSTEN M. De BEURS, KAMEL DIDAN, DAVID W. INOUYE, ANDREW D. RICHARDSON, OLAF P. JENSEN, JOHN O'KEEFE, GONG ZHANG, RAMAKRISHNA R. NEMANI, WILLEM J. D. Van LEEUWEN, JESSLYN F. BROWN, ALLARD De WIT, MICHAEL SCHAEPMAN, XIOAMAO LIN, MICHAEL DETTINGER, AMEY S. BAILEY, JOHN KIMBALL, MARK D. SCHWARTZ, DENNIS D. BALDOCCHI, JOHN T. LEE, WILLIAM K. LAUENROTH

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 731 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 25 3%
Germany 4 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Other 9 1%
Unknown 676 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 171 23%
Researcher 152 21%
Student > Master 99 14%
Student > Bachelor 38 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 33 5%
Other 122 17%
Unknown 116 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 224 31%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 155 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 132 18%
Engineering 16 2%
Computer Science 9 1%
Other 32 4%
Unknown 163 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2011.
All research outputs
#7,047,421
of 24,520,935 outputs
Outputs from Global Change Biology
#4,503
of 6,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,351
of 96,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Change Biology
#12
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,520,935 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,092 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.