↓ Skip to main content

Influence of aging in the thermoregulatory efficiency of man

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Biometeorology, June 1986
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Influence of aging in the thermoregulatory efficiency of man
Published in
International Journal of Biometeorology, June 1986
DOI 10.1007/bf02189454
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lazar Mathew, S. S. Purkayastha, R. Singh, J. Sen Gupta

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Researcher 2 17%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 17%
Student > Master 2 17%
Unknown 4 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 25%
Environmental Science 2 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 5 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1996.
All research outputs
#7,495,032
of 22,912,409 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Biometeorology
#677
of 1,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,967
of 10,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Biometeorology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,912,409 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them