| Title |
Depleted 15N in hydrolysable-N of arctic soils and its implication for mycorrhizal fungi–plant interaction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biogeochemistry, September 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10533-009-9365-1 |
| Authors |
Y. Yano, G. R. Shaver, A. E. Giblin, E. B. Rastetter |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 86 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 24% |
| Researcher | 17 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 19% |
| Unknown | 11 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 27 | 28% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 12 | 13% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2010.
All research outputs
#15,271,909
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from Biogeochemistry
#766
of 1,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,610
of 91,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biogeochemistry
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,055 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.