↓ Skip to main content

ECOSYSTEM SUBSIDIES: TERRESTRIAL SUPPORT OF AQUATIC FOOD WEBS FROM 13C ADDITION TO CONTRASTING LAKES

Overview of attention for article published in Ecology, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
323 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
442 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ECOSYSTEM SUBSIDIES: TERRESTRIAL SUPPORT OF AQUATIC FOOD WEBS FROM 13C ADDITION TO CONTRASTING LAKES
Published in
Ecology, October 2005
DOI 10.1890/04-1282
Authors

Stephen R. Carpenter, Jonathan J. Cole, Michael L. Pace, Matthew Van de Bogert, Darren L. Bade, David Bastviken, Caitlin M. Gille, James R. Hodgson, James F. Kitchell, Emma S. Kritzberg

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 442 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 19 4%
Canada 7 2%
Brazil 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 393 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 104 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 91 21%
Student > Master 67 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 33 7%
Student > Bachelor 26 6%
Other 78 18%
Unknown 43 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 175 40%
Environmental Science 150 34%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 32 7%
Engineering 4 <1%
Arts and Humanities 3 <1%
Other 17 4%
Unknown 61 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,629,858
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ecology
#3,406
of 7,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,569
of 73,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology
#9
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 73,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.