↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of 153 deaths after upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: room for improvement?

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, November 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Analysis of 153 deaths after upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: room for improvement?
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, November 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00464-003-9069-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. M. Thompson, D. J. Wright, W. Murray, G. L. Ritchie, H. D. Burton, P. A. Stonebridge

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 16%
Other 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 77%
Unspecified 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Unknown 4 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2018.
All research outputs
#14,599,159
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#2,866
of 6,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,699
of 142,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#15
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,839 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.