↓ Skip to main content

Using certified timber extraction to benefit jaguar and ecosystem conservation

Overview of attention for article published in Ambio, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Using certified timber extraction to benefit jaguar and ecosystem conservation
Published in
Ambio, December 2016
DOI 10.1007/s13280-016-0853-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Polisar, Benoit de Thoisy, Damián I. Rumiz, Fabricio Díaz Santos, Roan Balas McNab, Rony Garcia-Anleu, Gabriela Ponce-Santizo, Rosario Arispe, Claudia Venegas

Abstract

The jaguar Panthera onca requires large areas of relatively intact habitats containing adequate amounts of prey to survive. Since a substantial portion of jaguar range occurs outside of strict protected areas, there is a need for economic incentives for habitat conservation, which carefully managed selective logging can provide. Forest Stewardship Council and Pan European Forest Council certifications intended to regulate wood extraction to maintain the ecological functions of forests require evidence of biodiversity and ecosystem conservation. We draw on twelve surveys across four countries and a range of biomes to present evidence that adequate logging management can maintain jaguar populations, but that they are at risk without efficient control of secondary impacts of access and hunting. Where resident, the presence of jaguars can serve as an indication that the ecological requirements of certified timber extraction are being met. We present a gradient of rigor for monitoring, recommending cost-effective options.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 100 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Other 6 6%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 21 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 39%
Environmental Science 24 24%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 <1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 27 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,559,537
of 23,652,325 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#464
of 1,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,202
of 423,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#13
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,652,325 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,674 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.