Title |
Using certified timber extraction to benefit jaguar and ecosystem conservation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ambio, December 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s13280-016-0853-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
John Polisar, Benoit de Thoisy, Damián I. Rumiz, Fabricio Díaz Santos, Roan Balas McNab, Rony Garcia-Anleu, Gabriela Ponce-Santizo, Rosario Arispe, Claudia Venegas |
Abstract |
The jaguar Panthera onca requires large areas of relatively intact habitats containing adequate amounts of prey to survive. Since a substantial portion of jaguar range occurs outside of strict protected areas, there is a need for economic incentives for habitat conservation, which carefully managed selective logging can provide. Forest Stewardship Council and Pan European Forest Council certifications intended to regulate wood extraction to maintain the ecological functions of forests require evidence of biodiversity and ecosystem conservation. We draw on twelve surveys across four countries and a range of biomes to present evidence that adequate logging management can maintain jaguar populations, but that they are at risk without efficient control of secondary impacts of access and hunting. Where resident, the presence of jaguars can serve as an indication that the ecological requirements of certified timber extraction are being met. We present a gradient of rigor for monitoring, recommending cost-effective options. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 29% |
Peru | 1 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
Australia | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 14 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 100 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 27 | 27% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 14% |
Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
Other | 6 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 10% |
Unknown | 21 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 39% |
Environmental Science | 24 | 24% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | <1% |
Other | 3 | 3% |
Unknown | 27 | 27% |