| Title |
Periodical Cicada Detritus Impacts Stream Ecosystem Metabolism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecosystems, September 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10021-008-9194-4 |
| Authors |
Holly L. Menninger, Margaret A. Palmer, Laura S. Craig, David C. Richardson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 57 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 18% |
| Researcher | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 21% |
| Unknown | 6 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 49% |
| Environmental Science | 17 | 28% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2013.
All research outputs
#5,281,258
of 24,829,155 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#439
of 1,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,868
of 95,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,829,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.