You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diminishing return on investment for biodiversity data in conservation planning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Letters, October 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1755-263x.2008.00029.x |
| Authors |
Hedley S. Grantham, Atte Moilanen, Kerrie A. Wilson, Robert L. Pressey, Tony G. Rebelo, Hugh P. Possingham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 2% |
| Australia | 6 | 2% |
| Brazil | 5 | 2% |
| South Africa | 5 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Finland | 2 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Botswana | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 3% |
| Unknown | 230 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 82 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 14% |
| Other | 24 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 46 | 17% |
| Unknown | 15 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 115 | 43% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 96 | 36% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,824,440
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#674
of 1,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,723
of 107,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,076 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.4. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.