↓ Skip to main content

Added Value of Molecular Biological Analysis in Diagnosis and Clinical Management of Liposarcoma: A 30-Year Single-Institution Experience

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Added Value of Molecular Biological Analysis in Diagnosis and Clinical Management of Liposarcoma: A 30-Year Single-Institution Experience
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, November 2009
DOI 10.1245/s10434-009-0806-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ronald S. A. de Vreeze, Daphne de Jong, Petra M. Nederlof, Aafke Ariaens, Ivon H. G. Tielen, Luc Frenken, Rick L. Haas, Frits van Coevorden

Abstract

Treatment decisions and prognosis assessment for liposarcoma is based on a classification that depends on morphological and genetic features. Revisions by experienced referral pathologists are often advocated.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ukraine 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 17%
Other 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Unknown 8 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2009.
All research outputs
#15,271,909
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#4,357
of 6,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,904
of 165,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#30
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,430 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.