Title |
Added Value of Molecular Biological Analysis in Diagnosis and Clinical Management of Liposarcoma: A 30-Year Single-Institution Experience
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, November 2009
|
DOI | 10.1245/s10434-009-0806-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ronald S. A. de Vreeze, Daphne de Jong, Petra M. Nederlof, Aafke Ariaens, Ivon H. G. Tielen, Luc Frenken, Rick L. Haas, Frits van Coevorden |
Abstract |
Treatment decisions and prognosis assessment for liposarcoma is based on a classification that depends on morphological and genetic features. Revisions by experienced referral pathologists are often advocated. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ukraine | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 22 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 17% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 48% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2009.
All research outputs
#15,271,909
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#4,357
of 6,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,904
of 165,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#30
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,430 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.