↓ Skip to main content

Genetic invalidation of Lp-PLA2 as a therapeutic target: Large-scale study of five functional Lp-PLA2-lowering alleles

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic invalidation of Lp-PLA2 as a therapeutic target: Large-scale study of five functional Lp-PLA2-lowering alleles
Published in
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, December 2016
DOI 10.1177/2047487316682186
Pubmed ID
Authors

John M Gregson, Daniel F Freitag, Praveen Surendran, Nathan O Stitziel, Rajiv Chowdhury, Stephen Burgess, Stephen Kaptoge, Pei Gao, James R Staley, Peter Willeit, Sune F Nielsen, Muriel Caslake, Stella Trompet, Linda M Polfus, Kari Kuulasmaa, Jukka Kontto, Markus Perola, Stefan Blankenberg, Giovanni Veronesi, Francesco Gianfagna, Satu Männistö, Akinori Kimura, Honghuang Lin, Dermot F Reilly, Mathias Gorski, Vladan Mijatovic, the CKDGen consortium, Patricia B Munroe, Georg B Ehret, the International Consortium for Blood Pressure, Alex Thompson, Maria Uria-Nickelsen, Anders Malarstig, Abbas Dehghan, the CHARGE inflammation working group, Thomas F Vogt, Taishi Sasaoka, Fumihiko Takeuchi, Norihiro Kato, Yoshiji Yamada, Frank Kee, Martina Müller-Nurasyid, Jean Ferrières, Dominique Arveiler, Philippe Amouyel, Veikko Salomaa, Eric Boerwinkle, Simon G Thompson, Ian Ford, J Wouter Jukema, Naveed Sattar, Chris J Packard, Abdulla al Shafi Majumder, Dewan S Alam, Panos Deloukas, Heribert Schunkert, Nilesh J Samani, Sekar Kathiresan, the MICAD Exome consortium, Børge G Nordestgaard, Danish Saleheen, Joanna MM Howson, Emanuele Di Angelantonio, Adam S Butterworth, John Danesh, the EPIC-CVD consortium and the CHD Exome+ consortium

Abstract

Darapladib, a potent inhibitor of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2), has not reduced risk of cardiovascular disease outcomes in recent randomized trials. We aimed to test whether Lp-PLA2 enzyme activity is causally relevant to coronary heart disease. In 72,657 patients with coronary heart disease and 110,218 controls in 23 epidemiological studies, we genotyped five functional variants: four rare loss-of-function mutations (c.109+2T > C (rs142974898), Arg82His (rs144983904), Val279Phe (rs76863441), Gln287Ter (rs140020965)) and one common modest-impact variant (Val379Ala (rs1051931)) in PLA2G7, the gene encoding Lp-PLA2. We supplemented de-novo genotyping with information on a further 45,823 coronary heart disease patients and 88,680 controls in publicly available databases and other previous studies. We conducted a systematic review of randomized trials to compare effects of darapladib treatment on soluble Lp-PLA2 activity, conventional cardiovascular risk factors, and coronary heart disease risk with corresponding effects of Lp-PLA2-lowering alleles. Lp-PLA2 activity was decreased by 64% (p = 2.4 × 10(-25)) with carriage of any of the four loss-of-function variants, by 45% (p < 10(-300)) for every allele inherited at Val279Phe, and by 2.7% (p = 1.9 × 10(-12)) for every allele inherited at Val379Ala. Darapladib 160 mg once-daily reduced Lp-PLA2 activity by 65% (p < 10(-300)). Causal risk ratios for coronary heart disease per 65% lower Lp-PLA2 activity were: 0.95 (0.88-1.03) with Val279Phe; 0.92 (0.74-1.16) with carriage of any loss-of-function variant; 1.01 (0.68-1.51) with Val379Ala; and 0.95 (0.89-1.02) with darapladib treatment. In a large-scale human genetic study, none of a series of Lp-PLA2-lowering alleles was related to coronary heart disease risk, suggesting that Lp-PLA2 is unlikely to be a causal risk factor.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Qatar 1 1%
Unknown 79 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Master 10 12%
Professor 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 24 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Mathematics 2 2%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 28 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2023.
All research outputs
#750,793
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
#222
of 2,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,219
of 425,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
#3
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.