↓ Skip to main content

Symptoms analysis of 3D TV viewing based on Simulator Sickness Questionnaires

Overview of attention for article published in Quality and User Experience, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Symptoms analysis of 3D TV viewing based on Simulator Sickness Questionnaires
Published in
Quality and User Experience, December 2016
DOI 10.1007/s41233-016-0003-0
Authors

Kjell Brunnström, Kun Wang, Samira Tavakoli, Börje Andrén

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 8 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 19%
Psychology 2 13%
Computer Science 1 6%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2016.
All research outputs
#19,067,606
of 23,630,563 outputs
Outputs from Quality and User Experience
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#312,216
of 423,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality and User Experience
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,630,563 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them