↓ Skip to main content

The biodegradable spacer as a novel treatment modality for massive rotator cuff tears: a prospective study with 5-year follow-up

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 1,215)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
115 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
The biodegradable spacer as a novel treatment modality for massive rotator cuff tears: a prospective study with 5-year follow-up
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, December 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00402-016-2603-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vladimir Senekovic, Boris Poberaj, Ladislav Kovacic, Martin Mikek, Eliyahu Adar, Elana Markovitz, Eran Maman, Assaf Dekel

Abstract

The management of massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears (RCT) is challenging and associated with high failure rates. There are no current consensus or definitive guidelines concerning the optimal surgical treatment for this devastating condition. This study was designed to confirm the long-term safety and efficacy of the biodegradable inflatable InSpace™ system in patients with massive reparable or irreparable RCTs. In this open-label, single arm, prospective study, subjects with massive RCT underwent subacromial implantation with the biodegradable spacer. Follow-up visits were scheduled according to routine clinical practice. Shoulder function was evaluated using Total Constant Score (TCS). Twenty-four patients were treated and assessed. Four patients had partial tears, and in three of them RC repair was performed. These patients were not included in the efficacy analyses. Of the participating subjects who reached the 5-year follow-up, 84.6% of the patients showed a clinically significant improvement of at least 15 points in their score, while 61.54% showed at least 25 points of improvement. Only 10% of the treated patients showed no improvement or worsening in the shoulder score comparing to their baseline. An overall improvement in the total CS commencing at 3 months and sustained by 6 months through to 5 years of follow-up (P < 0.0001) was demonstrated. We conclude that in this initial cohort, arthroscopic implantation of InSpace™ system represented an effective alternative to the existing arthroscopic procedures in patients with painful massive RCT refractory to conservative management. Further randomized controlled trials comparing the clinical and functional outcomes after implantation of the InSpace™ device are warranted.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 135 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 18 13%
Student > Master 18 13%
Other 17 13%
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 26 19%
Unknown 33 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Engineering 2 1%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 41 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2017.
All research outputs
#782,598
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#9
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,297
of 423,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them