↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of conservative treatment of non specific spondylodiscitis

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of conservative treatment of non specific spondylodiscitis
Published in
European Spine Journal, May 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00586-009-0979-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

N. Bettini, M. Girardo, E. Dema, S. Cervellati

Abstract

The objective of this study was to analyse the presentation, aetiology, conservative management, and outcome of non-tuberculous pyogenic spinal infection in adults. We performed a retrospective review of 56 patients (35 women and 21 men) of pyogenic spinal infection presenting over a 7-year period (1999-2006) to the Department of Spinal Surgery of Hesperia Hospital. The medical records, radiologic imaging, bacteriology results, treatment, and complications of all patients were reviewed. The mean age at presentation was 47.8 years (age range 35-72 years), the mean follow-up duration was 12.5 months. The most common site of infection was lumbar spine (n: 48), followed by the thoracic spine (n: 8). Most patients were symptomatic for between 4 and 10 weeks before presenting to hospital. The frequently isolated pathogen was Staphylococcus aureus in 31 of 56 cases (57.6%). Percutaneous biopsies were diagnostic in 57% of patients; the open biopsy was indicated if closed biopsy failed and when the infection was not accessible by percutaneous technique. The patients were managed by conservative measures alone, including antibiotic therapy and spinal bracing. The mean period of antibiotic therapy was 8.5 weeks (range 6-9 weeks), followed by oral antibiotics for 6 weeks. All patients had a supportive spinal brace for mean 8 weeks (range 6-10 weeks). The duration of the administration of oral antibiotics was dependent on clinical and laboratory evidence (white cell count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein) that the infection was resolved. The follow-up MR gadolinium scans were essential to monitor the response to medical treatment. The diagnosis of pyogenic spinal infection should be considered in any patient presenting with severe localised unremitting back and neck pain, especially when accompanied with systemic features, such as fever and weight loss and in the presence of elevated inflammatory markers. The conservative management of infection with antibiotic therapy and spinal bracing was very successful.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 105 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 13%
Other 13 12%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Other 29 27%
Unknown 23 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 30 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2013.
All research outputs
#18,338,946
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#2,455
of 4,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,107
of 92,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#28
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,605 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.