↓ Skip to main content

Microbial life in Champagne Pool, a geothermal spring in Waiotapu, New Zealand

Overview of attention for article published in Extremophiles, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Microbial life in Champagne Pool, a geothermal spring in Waiotapu, New Zealand
Published in
Extremophiles, April 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00792-007-0073-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adrian Hetzer, Hugh W. Morgan, Ian R. McDonald, Christopher J. Daughney

Abstract

Surveys of Champagne Pool, one of New Zealand's largest terrestrial hot springs and rich in arsenic ions and compounds, have been restricted to geological and geochemical descriptions, and a few microbiological studies applying culture-independent methods. In the current investigation, a combination of culture and culture-independent approaches were chosen to determine microbial density and diversity in Champagne Pool. Recovered total DNA and adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP) content of spring water revealed relatively low values compared to other geothermal springs within New Zealand and are in good agreement with low cell numbers of 5.6 +/- 0.5 x 10(6) cells/ml obtained for Champagne Pool water samples by 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining. Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE) and 16S rRNA (small-subunit ribosomal nucleic acid) gene clone library analyses of environmental DNA indicated the abundance of Sulfurihydrogenibium, Sulfolobus, and Thermofilum-like populations in Champagne Pool. From these results, media were selected to target the enrichment of hydrogen-oxidizing and sulfur-dependent microorganisms. Three isolates were successfully obtained having 16S rRNA gene sequences with similarities of approximately 98% to Thermoanaerobacter tengcongensis, 94% to Sulfurihydrogenibium azorense, and 99% to Thermococcus waiotapuensis, respectively.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Canada 2 3%
Colombia 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
New Zealand 1 2%
Unknown 51 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 18%
Professor 7 12%
Student > Master 6 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Other 15 25%
Unknown 2 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 43%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Environmental Science 4 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 4 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2022.
All research outputs
#6,582,947
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from Extremophiles
#202
of 804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,121
of 76,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Extremophiles
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 804 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.