↓ Skip to main content

Managing the Risk of Uncertain Threshold Responses: Comparison of Robust, Optimum, and Precautionary Approaches

Overview of attention for article published in Risk Analysis: An International Journal, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
6 policy sources
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
353 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
459 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Managing the Risk of Uncertain Threshold Responses: Comparison of Robust, Optimum, and Precautionary Approaches
Published in
Risk Analysis: An International Journal, October 2007
DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00940.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert J Lempert, Myles T Collins

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 459 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 2%
United Kingdom 6 1%
Australia 4 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 426 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 120 26%
Researcher 83 18%
Student > Master 62 14%
Professor 27 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 5%
Other 64 14%
Unknown 79 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 96 21%
Environmental Science 90 20%
Social Sciences 33 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 30 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 18 4%
Other 81 18%
Unknown 111 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2017.
All research outputs
#1,772,237
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Risk Analysis: An International Journal
#255
of 2,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,745
of 92,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Risk Analysis: An International Journal
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.