| Title |
Evolution of recent economic-demographic modeling: A synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Population Economics, June 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00148-005-0222-9 |
| Authors |
Allen C. Kelley, Robert M. Schmidt |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 100 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 21% |
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 20% |
| Unknown | 20 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 47 | 46% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 20% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 23 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,767,732
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Population Economics
#99
of 819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,663
of 69,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Population Economics
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 819 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them