↓ Skip to main content

How Does Antiretroviral Treatment Attenuate the Stigma of HIV? Evidence from a Cohort Study in Rural Uganda

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
Title
How Does Antiretroviral Treatment Attenuate the Stigma of HIV? Evidence from a Cohort Study in Rural Uganda
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10461-013-0503-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander C. Tsai, David R. Bangsberg, Mwebesa Bwana, Jessica E. Haberer, Edward A. Frongillo, Conrad Muzoora, Elias Kumbakumba, Peter W. Hunt, Jeffrey N. Martin, Sheri D. Weiser

Abstract

Program implementers and qualitative researchers have described how increasing availability of HIV antiretroviral therapy (ART) is associated with improvements in psychosocial health and internalized stigma. To determine whether, and through what channels, ART reduces internalized stigma, we analyzed data from 262 HIV-infected, treatment-naïve persons in rural Uganda followed from ART initiation over a median of 3.4 years. We fitted Poisson regression models with cluster-correlated robust estimates of variance, specifying internalized stigma as the dependent variable, adjusting for time on treatment as well as socio-demographic, clinical, and psychosocial variables. Over time on treatment, internalized stigma declined steadily, with the largest decline observed during the first 2 years of treatment. This trend remained statistically significant after multivariable adjustment (χ(2) = 28.3; P = 0.03), and appeared to be driven by ART-induced improvements in HIV symptom burden, physical and psychological wellbeing, and depression symptom severity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 149 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 20%
Researcher 28 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 5%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 38 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 21%
Social Sciences 21 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 13%
Psychology 19 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 45 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2013.
All research outputs
#16,069,695
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#2,535
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,388
of 195,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#48
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.