| Title |
Decision making under ignorance: Arguing with yourself
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, January 1995
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01211526 |
| Authors |
Robin M. Hogarth, Howard Kunreuther |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 114 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 24% |
| Researcher | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
| Professor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 21% |
| Unknown | 17 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 23 | 19% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 21 | 17% |
| Psychology | 15 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 21% |
| Unknown | 24 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2018.
All research outputs
#2,839,921
of 25,292,378 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
#75
of 415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,285
of 78,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,378 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them