↓ Skip to main content

Understanding forecast failure of ESTAR models of real exchange rates

Overview of attention for article published in Empirical Economics, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Understanding forecast failure of ESTAR models of real exchange rates
Published in
Empirical Economics, March 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00181-011-0460-5
Authors

Daniel Buncic

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Lecturer 1 10%
Professor 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 60%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 10%
Mathematics 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2012.
All research outputs
#7,496,019
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from Empirical Economics
#229
of 703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,687
of 108,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Empirical Economics
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.