↓ Skip to main content

Combination Epigenetic Therapy in Advanced Breast Cancer with 5-Azacitidine and Entinostat: A Phase II National Cancer Institute/Stand Up to Cancer Study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combination Epigenetic Therapy in Advanced Breast Cancer with 5-Azacitidine and Entinostat: A Phase II National Cancer Institute/Stand Up to Cancer Study
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, May 2017
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-1729
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roisin M. Connolly, Huili Li, Rachel C. Jankowitz, Zhe Zhang, Michelle A. Rudek, Stacie C. Jeter, Shannon A. Slater, Penny Powers, Antonio C. Wolff, John H. Fetting, Adam Brufsky, Richard Piekarz, Nita Ahuja, Peter W. Laird, Hui Shen, Daniel J. Weisenberger, Leslie Cope, James G. Herman, George Somlo, Agustin A. Garcia, Peter A. Jones, Stephen B. Baylin, Nancy E. Davidson, Cynthia A. Zahnow, Vered Stearns

Abstract

In breast cancer models, combination epigenetic therapy with a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor and a histone deacetylase inhibitor led to re-expression of genes encoding important therapeutic targets including the estrogen receptor (ER). We conducted a multicenter phase II study of 5-azacitidine (AZA) and entinostat in women with advanced hormone-resistant or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Patients received AZA 40 mg/m2 (days 1-5, 8-10) and entinostat 7 mg (days 3,10) of 28 day cycle. Continuation of epigenetic therapy was offered with addition of endocrine therapy at time of progression (optional continuation, OC phase). Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) in each cohort. We hypothesized that ORR would be >20% against null of 5% using Simon two-stage design. At least 1 response was required in 1st of 13 patients per cohort to continue accrual to 27 per cohort. Type I error 4%, power 90%. There was one partial response among 27 women with hormone-resistant disease (ORR=4%, 95% CI=0-19%), and none in 13 women with TNBC. One additional partial response was observed in the OC phase in the hormone-resistant cohort (n=12). Mandatory tumor samples were obtained pre- and post-treatment (58% paired) with either up- or down-regulation of ER observed in approximately 50% of post-treatment biopsies in the hormone-resistant, but not TNBC cohort. Combination epigenetic therapy was well tolerated but our primary endpoint was not met. OC phase results suggest that some women benefit from epigenetic therapy and/or reintroduction of endocrine therapy beyond progression but further study is needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 118 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 15%
Researcher 17 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Student > Master 11 9%
Other 10 8%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 25 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 34 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,535,618
of 25,500,206 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#1,066
of 13,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,511
of 330,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#29
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,500,206 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.