↓ Skip to main content

How to minimize children’s environmental tobacco smoke exposure: an intervention in a clinical setting in high risk areas

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
How to minimize children’s environmental tobacco smoke exposure: an intervention in a clinical setting in high risk areas
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-13-76
Pubmed ID
Authors

Noomi Carlsson, AnnaKarin Johansson, Agneta Abrahamsson, Boel Andersson Gäre

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the low prevalence of daily smokers in Sweden, children are still being exposed to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), primarily by their smoking parents. A prospective intervention study using methods from Quality Improvement was performed in Child Health Care (CHC). The aim was to provide nurses with new methods for motivating and supporting parents in their efforts to protect children from ETS exposure. METHOD: Collaborative learning was used to implement and test an intervention bundle. Twenty-two CHC nurses recruited 86 families with small children which had at least one smoking parent. Using a bundle of interventions, nurses met and had dialogues with the parents over a one-year period. A detailed questionnaire on cigarette consumption and smoking policies in the home was answered by the parents at the beginning and at the end of the intervention, when children also took urine tests to determine cotinine levels. RESULTS: Seventy-two families completed the study. Ten parents (11%) quit smoking. Thirty-two families (44%) decreased their cigarette consumption. Forty-five families (63%) were outdoor smokers at follow up. The proportion of children with urinary cotinine values of >6 ng/ml had decreased. CONCLUSION: The intensified tobacco prevention in CHC improved smoking parents' ability to protect their children from ETS exposure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Unknown 64 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 21%
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 15 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 14%
Psychology 9 14%
Social Sciences 6 9%
Chemistry 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 17 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2013.
All research outputs
#6,386,024
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#1,200
of 3,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,838
of 196,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#14
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.