| Title |
Unemployment Benefit Systems in Central and Eastern Europe: A Review of the 1990s
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Comparative Economic Studies, December 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1057/palgrave.ces.8100062 |
| Authors |
Milan Vodopivec, Andreas Wörgötter, Dhushyanth Raju |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 50% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 38% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2013.
All research outputs
#3,522,518
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Comparative Economic Studies
#28
of 283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,014
of 156,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Comparative Economic Studies
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them